Mary’s co-redemption is tangible – When will her divinity arrive?

Deutsch

The issue of “Mary the Co-Redemptrix” is being rushed through. The Roman Catholic Church plans to publish a statement or determination on November 4, 2025, regarding the continuation of the ever-expanding functions of the Mother of Jesus Christ.

The Church of Rome continues undeterred

Apparently, Protestantism has degenerated to such an extent into nothingness, becoming a subservient daughter of Rome, that what has long been standardized consensus in the Roman Catholic Church is now to be made official: Mary, the biological mother of the incarnate Word of God, Jesus Christ, is to be elevated to the status of Co-Redemptrix. Mary, the “Co-Redemptrix” for the salvation of humankind. In the Church, what is considered official is what has been declared doctrine, that is, the definition of what people are now supposed to believe. However, if a “believer” has doubts, or even speaks out against such a pontifical dictate of faith, they are very quickly declared a heretic.

Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, later Pope Benedict XIV, and then Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (Inquisition), commented cautiously. Mary is not the direct Co-Redemptrix, but a “noble collaborator in Christ’s work of salvation.” That was about 25 years ago, and ecumenism had clearly not yet progressed to the point where returning the “reformist rebels” to the bosom of the scarlet-and-purple mother, adorned with gold, precious stones, and pearls, without the whining of her capricious daughter, was considered impossible. That has since changed. The time now seems ripe to elevate Mary to the status of an official savior of humankind.

Immaculate Conception of Mary

A process within the “unchanging Church of Rome,” preceded by two striking examples. Using the self-defined concept of original sin as its foundation, the Catholic Church developed a special status for Mary. The first approaches to the Immaculate Conception of Mary (the “Immaculata” concept) existed as early as the 10th century, beginning with the “Feast of the Conception of the Most Holy Mother of God to Anne.” The assertion that Mary was never tainted by original sin was established at the Council of Basel in September 1439. Pope Sixtus IV brought this innovation to Rome in 1477 and elevated the occasion to a solemnity.

It took nearly 400 years until Pope Pius IX, on December 8, 1854, established the “Immaculate Conception of Mary” as dogma in his bull “Ineffabilis Deus” (“The Ineffable God”).

Assumption of Mary

As early as the 5th century, Bishop Cyril of Alexandria invented the “Assumption of Mary into Heaven.” As fate would have it, Cyril designated August 15th as the feast day, the day celebrated by the pagan Romans as the “feriae Augusti,” commemorating the victory of the Roman Emperor Augustus over the Egyptian ruler Cleopatra and his rival Mark Antony. It wasn’t until 1950 that Pope Pius XII, through the apostolic constitution “Munificentissimus Deus” (“The Infinitely Generous God”), declared the “bodily Assumption of Mary into Heaven” to be official Church doctrine.

This constitution states, among other things:
“We proclaim, declare, and define it as a divinely revealed article of faith that the Immaculate Mother of God, the ever-pure Virgin Mary, after completing her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory.“

“Explains and defines” a doctrine AS originating from God. This is therefore a classic fiction, because a fiction is something that does not actually exist but is treated as such. The Church says so, it defines it, and therefore it is law and must be believed. Does one’s own conscience disagree? Irrelevant!

Tradition about the Gospel

The Catholic principle: Mary, freed from “original sin” and thus not subject to the fallen flesh of man, ascended into heaven “body and soul” to act as mediator between Jesus and humanity ever since, interceding should her son, due to excessive wrath, lose his desire for grace. Is there anything of this to be found in the Bible? No, nowhere! But the Catholic Church believes that, as the “mystical body of Christ,” it is imbued with the Holy Spirit and has grown in faith over the centuries. Therefore, tradition takes precedence over the Bible, and the Gospel must be understood in the light of the Catholic Catechism.

The (ecumenical) Council of Trent (1547-1563) celebrated a “Day of Anathema” during its 14th session on November 25, 1551. No fewer than 15 dictates, the disobedience of which, or denial of faith, leads to excommunication. These pronouncements, however, have less the character of the Gospel, or what this church imagines itself to be, but rather pertain to its proclaimed absolute authority.

What does the Bible say about this?

Regarding the traditions of this church, the Gospel, the Word of God, naturally conveys something entirely different from the Roman Catholic Church, Colossians 2:8:
“Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.”

Paul also had something quite clear to say on the subject of “anathema,” Galatians 1:8-9:
“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.“

Paul wrote this to the young church in Galatia in the first century, referring to the Gospel, which by that time was already firmly established. “Something other” than the Gospel, be it a change, a deletion, or even an addition, is what’s at stake. Now it’s up to the Christian to decide whether to acknowledge the authority of the Gospel’s words or to follow the dictates of creative clergymen whose primary motivation has always been not only to secure their position, power, and wealth, but also to expand them along with their catalog of traditions.

Increasingly loud calls for “Co-Redemptrix”

The Vatican announced that it will publish the document “Co-Redemption,” developed by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (Inquisition), on November 4, 2025. Many proponents of this ideal are calling for “Co-Redemption” to be declared a dogma. Cardinal Víctor Fernández, Prefect of the Dicastery, is expected to present the document, “Mater populi fidelis,” in Rome at the Jesuit Curia. (Source). Described as a lobby in business and politics, and also operating within the Church’s sphere of influence, the International Marian Association petitioned Pope Francis in 2017 to recognize Mary as “Co-Redemptrix with Jesus the Redeemer.”

As if the popes, in their succession and respective infallibility, were each inspired by a different Holy Spirit, there is no consensus on this issue either. Pope John Paul II, a pronounced devotee of Mary, used the title “Co-Redemptrix” for her publicly on several occasions. Pope Benedict XVI, however, backtracked, deeming this position somewhat too bold. Pope Francis did, however, emphasize that Mary already has a number of beautiful titles, but Christ is the only Redeemer, and Mary was not entrusted to the faithful as “Mother, Goddess, or Co-Redemptrix.”

Mary fan John Henry Newman

John Henry Newman was another cleric enamored with Mary. The former pastor of the (Protestant) Church of England, who converted to the Roman Catholic Church in 1845 after the gradual Catholicization of his church (the Oxford Movement) and was promptly elevated to cardinal, is to be declared the 38th Doctor of the Church on November 1, 2025. Newman’s position was that Mary is the cause of our salvation, thus following in the footsteps of “Saint” Irenaeus of Lyon (c. 140-200 AD). Irenaeus was declared the 37th Doctor of the Church by Pope Francis in 2022.

Irenaeus’ most outstanding surviving work is “Adversus haereses” (“Against Heresies”). It sounds like the self-proclaimed “Church Father” had good intentions. However, this is only a first impression, as his writing is also considered a “goldmine” for Gnosticism, which arose in the 2nd century. It’s a “wisdom” based on a blend of the Gospels and Hellenistic philosophies. The ultimate result can be seen in Roman Catholic social teaching (Info).

Another declared Doctor of the Church (No. 18) is Alphonsus Liguori. Pope Pius XI secured the Italian bishop a place in the Catholic Church’s Hall of Fame in 1871. His best-known work, besides “Dignities and Duties of the Priest” (Info), is his oath of Marian devotion, “Le glorie di Maria.” In this book, Liguori greets Mary as Queen and declares her to be the “gate to heaven” that Mary bestowed upon humanity.

For this he uses the statement of his countryman Bonaventure (1221 – 1274), also a Doctor of the Church (No. 10):
“No one can enter heaven except through Mary, as through a door.“

What was still missing?

Since it appears that the excessive elevation of Mary is intended to secure a place among the declared Doctors of the Church, only the proverbial finishing touch was missing to seize the greatest conceivable, immortal recognition: the declaration of Mary as a goddess.

As the currently recognized “Mother of God,” Mary already comes dangerously close to another doctrine declared by the Church of Rome. The ancient Romans already knew of a Mari, the goddess of the seas, in Latin “Maria.” This mother-child relationship was also known to the ancient Egyptians. Isis gave birth to the son Horus, the reincarnation of Osiris (see info on the Catholic Maria is part of the Isis cult). Osiris was the brother of Isis. The ancient Greeks also had a similar story with Zeus and Demeter. Their daughter was Persephone (also called Kore). According to mythology, Zeus, in the form of a snake, crawled inside Persephone and fathered a son, Zagreus, who would become Zeus’s successor.

Back to Babylon

The original form of this conception of offspring or reincarnations among siblings is found in Nimrod and Semiramis, and with that, we arrive in ancient Babylon. Nimrod, also mentioned in the Bible (Genesis 10:8-9), was the great-grandson of Noah, grandson of Ham, and son of Cush. He built the cities of Nineveh and Babylon. He was the “first ruler on earth” and “mighty hunter before the Lord.” His ambition was to rebel against God and His law. The great Tower of Babel was meant to be the expression of this. Semiramis bore a son, fathered by Nimrod, and also the reincarnation of Nimrod that she declared, known among other names as Tammuz.

When Nimrod died, Semiramis decreed official mourning, expressed by ashes on his head and an ash cross on his forehead. The Roman Catholic Church still observes this period of mourning today as Ash Wednesday (Info).

It is only logical that the Catholic Virgin Mary should also be granted the status of divinity. Immaculateness, bodily Assumption, Co-Redemptrix, Mother of God. Her “divinity” is already in the pipeline, and it is only a matter of time before a binding doctrine is formulated on this point as well.

“for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.“, so is the self-glorification of Babylon according to Revelation 18:7, which will suffer the same fate as literal Babylon in antiquity:

Bible verses from King James Version (1611)