Divine Co-Redemptrix Mary – Further Dogma in Prospect?

Deutsch

Mary is undoubtedly the center of the Catholic Church. This applies to the Roman Catholic Church as well as the Eastern Church. The time now seems ripe to “finally” officially recognize the Mother of Jesus’ “divinity” and her status as Co-Redemptrix.

Maria always in the center

A gradual process that has been ongoing for many centuries. A little more here, then another on top, until the desired goal is achieved. A similar strategy also seems to be at work in the constant elevation of the Roman Catholic version of Mary. She is not just the “simple mother” of Jesus Christ, but also automatically the “Mother of God.” The Church of Rome has ascended Mary into heaven. Initially as a narrated legend, according to tradition, and finally (only) in 1950, Pope Pius XII declared it dogma.

Over the past centuries, the Roman Catholic Church has developed four dogmas for Mary.

1. Mary, the Mother of God
2. Mary, the Ever Virgin
3. The Immaculate Conception of Mary
4. Mary’s Assumption into Heaven

What the Church declares as dogma must be accepted as fact and believed.

Motherhood of God

This was also the case in 431, when the Motherhood of God was “established” at the Council of Ephesus, and twenty years later, at the Council of Chalcedon, it was officially confirmed. Among other things, it states that Mary is the Mother of God because she gave life to the “divine Logos,” the second person of God. Anyone who does not confess that Mary is the Mother of God (Theotokos) is excluded, that is, excommunicated.

Forever Virgin

That Mary was a virgin when the Holy Spirit came upon her (Luke 1) is biblically established. But this wasn’t enough for the Church of Rome. The Church promptly declared that Mary remained a virgin throughout her life, even though the biblical statements convey the exact opposite. More children were born, and Joseph was the father of each of them. By the Second Council of Constantinople (553), this “perpetual virginity of Mary” was already a matter of course.

Without original sin

The Immaculate Conception of Mary was clearly very important to the Roman Catholic Church. Therefore, it formulated this fact from its very beginning. But it wasn’t until 1854 that Pope Pius IX established Mary’s liberation from “original sin” as a binding dogma. Thus, Mary was “mystically” freed from original sin at her birth. She was therefore without guilt, without sin, in the unfallen state like Eve at the beginning, and remained so throughout her life.

Thus, she was also not in the “flesh of sin.” That’s the Roman Church’s answer on this point. However, the Bible also has something to say about this. For, according to Paul, Jesus Christ was born in the “flesh of sin,” thus a “completely normal” human being. Romans 8:3:
“ …God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:“

According to the dogma of the Roman Church, Jesus could not have been born in the “flesh of sin,” because His mother, as the “Immaculate,” did not have this condition. The consequence of this is significant, for 2 John 1:7:
“For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.“

Assumption into heaven with body and soul

“Munificentissimus Deus” is the title of Pope Pius XII’s letter declaring the Assumption of Mary into Heaven “body and soul.”
“It is a truth of faith revealed by God that the Immaculate, Ever-Virgin Mother of God, having completed her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory,” states the decree of faith for all devout Catholics. Anyone who tries to look for such statements in the Bible will not find them.

It’s time for Marian expansion

Around 75 years have now passed since the last establishment of another dogma concerning Mary. Another definition has been pending for at least as long. If Mary has already taken her place in the heavenly throne room, is the Mother of God, and thus “actually” must be divine herself, and has long exerted a significant influence on the salvation of humanity through her “all-loving and tender nature,” then Mary should finally be recognized as the official Co-Redemptrix.

Mary is “the source of grace,” as the Mother of Jesus, and as his mother, also a soothing force when the “angry Jesus” should ever lose strength or desire for grace. Not only the Church of Rome, but also the Eastern Church, which seceded in 1054, is constantly striving for “Mary the Co-Redemptrix.” This is impressively demonstrated by their “Marian Hymn” with the following examples (excerpts):

• “Hail, you are far superior to all human superiority.”
  Mary was a normal, sinful human being.
• “Hail, from you creation is reborn.”
  Jesus Christ is the Creator.
• “Hail, you have crushed the deceived deceiver;”
  A variation of Genesis 3:15, Jesus actually crushes the head of the serpent.
• “Hail, Rock, from which those who thirst for life may drink.”
  The Rock is Jesus Christ.
• “Hail, Sea, which swallowed the world of the Pharaohs;”
  that was Jesus Christ through Moses.
• “Hail, Food, which brought manna replaced;”
  Mary never replaced Jesus, the Bread of Life

The few examples from the first and sixth verses alone are full of divine attributes of Mary, which actually describe Jesus Christ.

Co-Redemptrix Mary now hotly debated

The time now seems to have come for the Church of Rome to finally attribute to Mary the attribute of her divinity and also her position as Co-Redemptrix (Maria coredemptrix). This has long been a consensus, but given the high priority given to ecumenism, the Church had initially refrained from doing so. Protestantism would probably have protested. Today, however, as a puppet stuffed with Catholic philosophy, no further opposition can be expected from the major Lutheran-Evangelical churches (Info).

The Roman Catholic Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (Inquisition) is about to publish a corresponding document. A reference to the Co-Redemptrix of Mary, first published in a Salzburg text in the 15th century (Source). Within the Church of Rome, there are ardent advocates, but also critical voices. However, the primary topics addressed are “Marian apparitions” and other “supernatural phenomena,” and in this context, of course, the “divinity” of Mary is also relevant.

Phenomena Manual

A “handbook” for dealing with such phenomena today was published by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith under Prefect Cardinal Fernández on 17 May 2024 (Source). What is interesting, at least, is that previous “miracle apparitions,” such as those in Fatima in particular, are no longer recognized by the Church under current practice.

Double-tongued game

Whatever the outcome of the modern Roman Inquisition, the relatively new Pope Leo XIV will likely have a say, as even the very first attributes of Mary completely contradict the Gospel. Her status as co-redeemer would simply be the crowning glory of the entire rhetoric surrounding the Catholicized Isis of ancient Egypt (Info), whose mythological origins can be found in Babylon with Nimrod and Semiramis.

The duplicitous nature of the Church of Rome is clearly evident here as well. With the rise of “rainbow culture” at the end of the first decade after 2000, the Church of Rome has consistently practiced modest and admonishing restraint in its hypocrisy. A passage in the wake of the 6th trumpet in Revelation 9 describes this essentially hypocritical behavior very well.

“And thus I saw the horses in the vision, and them that sat on them, having breastplates of fire, and of jacinth, and brimstone: and the heads of the horses were as the heads of lions; and out of their mouths issued fire and smoke and brimstone. By these three was the third part of men killed, by the fire, and by the smoke, and by the brimstone, which issued out of their mouths.” (Revelation 9:17-18)

The visible modern Babylon

Fiery, purple, and sulfur-yellow armor and lion heads. Fire, smoke, and sulfur killed a third of humanity. The attributes of the dragon, the beast, and the false prophet, along with their destructive teachings, together form the Babylon of the end times. This teaching, or ideology, brought (spiritual) death to a third of humanity.

Rejected “rainbow culture, wokeism” but still held on to the old traditions:

“And the rest of the men which were not killed by these plagues yet repented not of the works of their hands, that they should not worship devils, and idols of gold, and silver, and brass, and stone, and of wood: which neither can see, nor hear, nor walk:” (Revelation 9:20)

Bible verses from King James Version (1611)