The events of the past centuries up to the present day have long been described or announced, from rough outlines to individual details. All this in an ancient book, which, due to massive influences, is largely regarded as nothing more than a collection of fairy tales.
Inhalt / Content
- 1 The goals are described in detail
- 2 Most of it is published, so it’s obvious
- 3 The big “model” is the Catholic Church
- 4 Everything so natural? Why not question?
- 5 Declared human rights on an occult basis?
- 6 Catholic Church biblical or self-creation?
- 7 The “whore of Babylon” according to Revelation
- 8 The second beast erects the image of the first beast
- 9 Developments right after the Biden election
- 10 What is the mark of the beast – the number “666”?
- 11 Merging of religions
The goals are described in detail
Social upheavals or restructuring, as well as other political decisions, are usually announced publicly. Hardly anyone pays attention. Thus, statements about “society’s transformation” are also obvious and, thanks to the respective publications, accessible to everyone at any time. The “initiators” openly declare their agenda, and, as always, follow the motto: “We told you so.”
On December 11, 2020, the Council for Inclusive Capitalism published a video piece detailing exactly what these “wishes” look like. The head of this council is Lynn Forester de Rothschild. The demeanor and content of this six-minute piece are unmistakable. The message, which was proclaimed by a member of the richest family on the planet, could also be interpreted as a “bad joke.” The thrust of the statement is that there are too many poor people and very few very rich people.
Key statements include “social justice”, “solidarity”, “religious union” and “social basic income”, labelled “free development of the potential of every individual”. (Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJoXwh0Vu9M ). Anyone can see this post and draw their own conclusions from it.
Most of it is published, so it’s obvious
The principle is always the same and affects the political level as well as the theological one. The motto is: “Anyone could know”. Who looks at the Federal Gazette regularly? (published laws, bundesanzeiger.de), on the Bundestag agenda (bundestag.de/tagesordnung) and in other publicly available information from the public sector?
The media only reports on what’s “convenient,” and even then, in the form of “what they need to know about it,” if anything is even discussed at all. It should be understood like a notice board in a town hall (registry office) or courthouse. The posting of information is considered published and therefore public. This fulfills the obligation to provide information, and anyone who still doesn’t know has simply failed to fulfill their obligation to obtain it. Therefore, even those who are ignorant can justifiably be assumed to have acted voluntarily or accepted the matter. This is how it’s handled in the legal system, and this is the ubiquitous principle. It’s also somewhat understandable, since otherwise, a corresponding notification would have to be sent to individual households after every new standard or regulation.
What’s “piquant,” however, is the call for all citizens to abide by the law, and should anyone question it critically, they are declared “too stupid” to even understand the legal texts. Conversely, how can someone proclaim their own adherence to the law if they don’t even have a grasp of the now-inflated set of rules?
Here, people’s laziness and lack of time are exploited, their daily lives are filled with entertainment (from “keep them down”), and they are also happy to instill fear and terror through alarmism. All of this is detrimental to finding the truth and its now almost insurmountably complex connections.
The big “model” is the Catholic Church
While the “worldly” consequences for each individual generally also bring “worldly” disadvantages, they would be irrelevant in relation to responsibility or justification before God. However, the paths of deception, with the goal of separating people from God, were already taken and accelerated long ago. This applies to the theological level in the direct sense as well as to society in general in terms of thinking, views, values, and education.
This issue was addressed very early on during the Counter-Reformation. The persecution of those who deviated from the Catholic catechism, which culminated in the extermination of the Albigensians, Cathars, and Waldensians even before the Reformation, as well as the St. Bartholomew’s Day Mass, once celebrated by the Vatican, and other “campaigns,” failed to destroy Protestantism. With the translation and dissemination of the Bible into German, the suppression of the truth was brought to a (temporary) end.
Protestantism in Europe was curbed through violent countermeasures, but its spread to the rest of the world was actually encouraged. The Huguenots fled to South Africa, and the first settlers in the “New World” were overwhelmingly Protestants. They were able to practice their Protestant faith undisturbed in their new homeland without being persecuted as heretics (deviants from the Catholic catechism) and, in some cases, even murdered.
What Martin Luther, who, in addition to the first German translation of the New Testament, also introduced the education of the “common people,” already recognized as a danger was ultimately implemented by the Vatican. If violence cannot achieve the goal, then education will. People’s thinking was addressed.
With enormous success. Society’s thinking was redirected away from faith and toward “humanism” and “common sense.” At the same time, efforts to discredit the Bible as unreliable and a collection of ancient fairy tales grew. Countries that once fiercely defended Protestantism are now the countries with the largest proportions of atheists. For example, Sweden and the Czech Republic. (keyword: Jan Hus).
The Vatican, however, did not succeed in destroying the Bible. However, more recent versions of the Bible must be treated with extreme caution, as statements have been distorted into their extreme opposites on a large scale. (Info).
Everything so natural? Why not question?
Just one example illustrates how far people’s carelessness and uncritical acceptance of supposedly self-evident truths have progressed.
The fascia (or fascia) is a symbol of fascism and had its heyday in the ancient Roman Empire.
I wonder why it seems to be no problem at all that this symbol sometimes adorns the wall behind the lectern of the US Congress in the Capitol in duplicate. Why is this so natural? Someone must have put some thought into its choice and design. After all, the symbol “Fascia” was also used extensively by Benito Mussolini for the fascist system he had established at the time. (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fasci_italiani_di_combattimento)
Declared human rights on an occult basis?
The first official declaration of human rights after the French Revolution is also striking. In addition to the extremely visible fascia in the middle, the “spiritual fathers” of this explanation also took the example of Moses’ tablet of the law. All decorated with a snake biting its own tail, a Jacobean cap (Phrygian cap), a female angel and the pyramid with the eye at the zenith. After all, someone must have had a reason for this choice of symbols (Details).
What is certain is that this has nothing to do with the Gospel, even if the recreated Tablets of Moses’ Law may have intended to suggest this. To this day, so-called humanism, which originated in Hellenistic philosophy, has largely established itself. For the majority of people, humanism represents pure reason, a kind of substitute for religion, which serves “solidarity,” “social justice,” and the “common good.” However, a glance at the propositions of declared human rights up to the present quickly reveals that, in many respects, they are diametrically opposed to God’s commandments.
Catholic Church biblical or self-creation?
The religious doctrine presented externally by the Catholic Church bears the label of the Gospel, but is filled with a toxic mix of ancient Greek philosophy and Babylonian idolatry, within a structure modeled on Medo-Persia. Before 1798, the state enforcement of Catholic dogmas (including the transfer of judgment to secular jurisdiction) was based on Roman law.
The doctrine, particularly with regard to the “Mother Mary” (mother-child depiction), the numerous sun symbols, the obelisks, etc., originates from Babylonian and ancient Egyptian dogmas. For example, the uppermost part of the obelisk of Tutmosis III (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thutmose_III) decorates Lateran Square in Rome, in front of the main church of the Vatican. What do Egyptian god symbols have to do with the gospel?
This constellation of different philosophies and dogmas of the historical ages is very impressively illustrated by the biest depicted in Rev. 13.2:
“And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.“.
In the book Daniel 7 and the historical events are very nicely explained that the lion is Babylon, the panther is Greece, and the bear’s feet are Medo-Persia. Likewise the sequence of the statue (dream interpretation of the statue in Daniel 2 ) from the head down, which explains the two iron legs of the Roman Empire based on the historical developments in addition to Babylon, Medo-Persia and Greece, as well as the (current) constellation Feet made of iron and clay.
In keeping with the statement “the dragon gave him his strength,” this is an “ornament” of Pope Gregory XIII’s coat of arms, also found in St. Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican. What does a dragon have to do with the Gospel, other than the fact of who is defined as a dragon in Scripture?
In short: The Catholic Church does not serve God our Creator, but his fallen adversary in the form of Isis, Osiris, Horus, Seth, Pan, Baal, Mithras, etc.
The wafer (“host”) in the Eucharist serves as a symbol of the sun, which is placed in the round bowl (also symbolized as an open-topped crescent moon). This symbolizes, among other things, the headdress of the depicted “Mother of Horus,” Isis, as well as her depiction in a “mother-child image.”
This sun god cult extended through Baal (the first “tyrant” Nimrod), Pergamon,
the Roman Empire, and finally to the Roman Catholic Church, whose head, in a smooth transition in the 4th century, assumed, among other titles, the title “Pontifex Maximus” (from Babylon, Pergamon, then the Roman Empire, meaning “Supreme Bridge Builder”).
The “whore of Babylon” according to Revelation
Also the description of the “mother of all harlots” in Revelation 17 speak a clear language. “And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:”
This “Mother of Harlots” holds a golden cup in her hand. In the colored woodcut by Lucas Cranach the Elder, the “Whore of Babylon,” dressed in purple, also wears the triple tiara—the papal crown symbolizing sovereignty in heaven, on earth, and in the underworld. Revelation clearly describes this as a mother. Thus, she has daughters, who are described here as harlots.
According to Rev. 17:18 the “great city” which exercises dominion over the kings of the earth. The statement of the former prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (“Modern” Inquisition) Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger is particularly interesting. In the context of ecumenism and the “repatriation” of the Protestant churches of his time, he stated that “the universal, one, holy, catholic and apostolic church is not sister but mother of all particular churches”. (*6
You have to first muster this chutzpah, as the Vatican minted a coin in 1955 (100 lire, “Fides”) depicting a woman holding a cup, and of course, the sun depicted in the cup. Everything is out in the open and thus obvious. Anyone could ponder the countless clashes between Roman Catholic doctrine and the Gospel.
The second beast erects the image of the first beast
Now my assessment of the time according to the descriptions and predictions in the Revelation of the New Testament. The current events since the beginning of 2021 seem to make the predicted developments clear. The developments that have long been observed, especially in the USA, point to the predictions according to Revelation 13.
The image of the first beast is erected by the second beast. The second beast comes out of the earth, has horns like a lamb but roars like a dragon. The lamb describes the Christian faith according to the gospel (early Protestantism), the dragon the adversary, which also gives the first beast its own power.
Aside from the architecture of the US Capitol, which is a twin of St. Peter’s Basilica, the US administration’s “politically Christian” ambitions became particularly evident in the last election campaign. One must not lose sight of the fact that the US, including its Constitution, was founded in the Protestant spirit, but within the framework of religious freedom.
Washington DC is located within the state of Maryland (“Mary’s Land”), whose co-founder was a Jesuit named Andrew White who moved from England
(https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_White). His former estate was called the “House of White”, or just “Whitehouse”. New US President Joe Biden is the second Catholic President in US history. The first Catholic US President was John F. Kennedy. However, he advocated a strict separation between church and state. In the meantime, “The Supreme Court” of the USA is occupied by a majority (6 out of 9) of Catholics and the Director of the Supreme Court, who was still appointed by US President Trump, is an arch-conservative Catholic.
The previous and current Speaker of the Whitehouse are Catholics. About 9 years ago, the first Jesuit entered the US Senate. There are now 14 Senate members who have at least one Jesuit education behind them. (Source: https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2021/01/05/senate-catholic-jesuit-educated-239652 ).
And one is astonished: After decades of diplomatic “lack of contact” between Washington and the Vatican, US President Ronald Reagan tangled with Rome again for the first time in 1984. It then went very quickly. In 2011, the cities of Washington DC and Rome formed a partnership (https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/srgia/166853.htm) and thus the first and only city twinning of Rome.
The US administration has sometimes explained this step as a “useful tool for furthering foreign policy goals“. Then-Washington Mayor Gray stated that this partnership with Rome “marked the formal beginning of sustained cultural, educational, environmental and economic exchanges between two world-class capitals“. The Rome-Washington constellation results in a “historical power couple“. For the occasion, the ancient Roman sculpture Capitoline Venus was loaned to Washington. This sculpture last left Rome when Napoleon stole it after conquering Rome in 1797.
Here one should consider that Napoleon the then Pope Pius VI. (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pius_VI.) removed from office, deposed him and thus ended the secular power of the Catholic Church. With the founding of the Vatican in 1929 (Lateran Treaties with Mussolini, https://de .wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateran Treaties), the Vatican spoke of the “beginning of a healing wound”.
With the election of Biden (Catholic), headlines about the “healing of the USA” were also seen in the German media. Last but not least, the Vatican itself “USA: Time to heal the wounds” (https://www.vaticannews.va/de/welt/news/2021-01/usa-biden-joe-praesident-vatikan-amerika-politik-gesellschaft.html)
What does the Bible say about the first beast (out of the water)? Revelation 13:3: “And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.“.
What does the Bible say about the second beast (from the earth)? Revelation 13:12: “And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.“
There is actually no way around it: The first beast is the papacy and the second beast is the USA (Info). The states possess the necessary global power to enforce the dogmas of the Catholic Church globally, politically, economically, and militarily. The Catholic Church will extend its second leg to Washington, thus re-establishing the medieval world state structure, albeit with a modern label.
The wound is thus finally healed. The United States is establishing the image (dogmas, social teachings, gods, etc.) of the papacy and also possesses the power to enforce it globally. Together with the ongoing unification of other religions, the directing of attention to Jerusalem and the issue of a “Third Temple” there, the “abomination of desolation” will be established.
Developments right after the Biden election
A Vatican vision declared on January 6, 2021 reads: “If 2012 had been the year when Catholics ruled the highest levels of public life in the United States, 2021 could be the year when the highest levels of public life finally made way for the fullness of a Catholic vision.” (Source: https://religionnews.com/2021/01/06/could-catholic-moral-theology-light-the-way -for-a-new-gop/ )
A clear message from January 7, 2021 is the jubilation on the part of Catholicism: “For the first time in American history, no branch of our federal government will be led by a Protestant. The President will be Catholic.” and “The Protestantism was once the main ballast of America’s public life – helping us steady ourselves amidst the choppy waters that accompany life in a democratic republic. That ballast is gone and the long-term impact on American life is being felt everywhere.” (Source: https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2021/01/07/a-catholic-moment/ )
The announcement of January 6, 2021 is also unequivocal: “Biden has already stated his intention to take measures on a global level that would be compatible with Catholic social teaching.” This statement is wrapped in the benevolent-sounding framework of “avoiding a world war”.
(Source: https://www.ncronline.org/news/justice/how-biden-can-lead-us-away-world-war-fought-piecemeal )
Conclusion: The second beast will exercise the authority of the first beast. Revealed prophecy is happening here and now before our very eyes!
What is the mark of the beast – the number “666”?
In view of the fact that without exception all prophecies made in the Bible actually came true and some announcements are still open, I am convinced that these will also come true as described. Here are a few more details to consider. Much fuss is made about the mark of the beast, which is also prominently indicated in Revelation, its name and the number (number of a man, “666”). The spirits argue about this number (of a person).
What is certain is that the papacy declared itself very early on as “Vicarius Filii Dei” (“Representative of the Son of God”) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarius_Filii_Dei). This designation appeared for the first time in the document on the donation of Constantine, which has long been recognized as a forgery. Mathematicians come up with the number “666” with this term (more information).
The mark is partly explained by a chip implant, and more recently by “smart crystals” in COVID vaccinations. However, I disagree. Why would the Book of Revelation, which is brimming with symbolic language, now speak of tangible things about the mark?
For this the Paul Galatian 6:17: “From henceforth let no man trouble me: for I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus.“.
At this point, who would think that Paul was using marks to describe any external characteristics? Rather, it expresses the fact that Paul is in Jesus and Jesus is in him through his deep faith. Also the call in Revelation 7:3: “Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads.“ will hardly describe a “sticker” between the eyes.
In my opinion, the mark on the forehead is about faith and the mark on the hand is about the completed deeds (acts). The image of the beast is idolatry according to the dogmas of the Catholic Church (1st beast), implemented by the world power Washington (2nd beast). Those who believe in their teachings take the mark of the beast on the forehead, whoever participates in the rituals without faith accepts the mark on the hand. The pressure on people will become immense after the initial “voluntary” nature of the offering, which is already indicated in Revelation 13, with the possibility of “buying and selling” only for those who bear the mark of the beast.
In practice, this means exclusion from economic activity. The trial run of the digital euro, which has already begun, as well as the social restructuring toward “social justice” in conjunction with a “basic income,” would provide good conditions for the controlled dependence of people. However, the tribulation, which will be the “worst” that has ever existed on earth (and will never again), will only begin when all things have been decided. God’s judgment will then already be complete.
In my opinion, this danger of taking the mark on one’s hand primarily affects atheists, who have little understanding of the context and probably don’t care about it either. “Just go along with it and it’ll be fine.” For the other group, i.e., the believers, a massive deception is actively being (continued). When Jesus was asked by his disciples when the end would come, Jesus responded not with a timeline, but directly with a warning that people should be careful not to allow themselves to be led astray by anyone. This underscores the particular explosiveness of the issue.
Merging of religions
Here we are dealing with believers who may have left institutional churches. I see Protestants as being particularly at risk of “accidentally” accepting the mark on their foreheads (of faith), as they believe themselves to be relatively safe, since they do not primarily follow the dogmas of the Catholic Church. The now-completed merger with the “mother church” and the acceptance or submission are apparently not being communicated very openly in the congregations. Therefore, the consequences of the practical reunification within the framework of ecumenism are probably not well-known to many.
For Protestants as well as Catholics, however, the fact remains that the teachings they espouse must harmonize with the content of the Gospel, and this can only be achieved through active examination, or better yet, self-study. However, grace and justification for each individual lie exclusively in Jesus’ hands.
Separation from God is the goal pursued by the “great adversary,” who ultimately seeks to occupy the throne and be worshipped. Where would the ultimate satisfaction lie? In coercion, or in their (justifiably assumed) voluntary compliance? Hence the great deception, which could certainly be exposed through obvious information (the Bible!), if only people would make the effort. Instead, proclaimed, usually well-sounding messages are often accepted without question.
In my opinion, the misleading of people also applies to the desired fusion with the Jewish faith, and this is based on the principle of “fulfillment of a self-made prophecy.” I need to elaborate a little on this.
Already in the area of 1590 created the Spanish Jesuit Franciso Ribera (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Ribera) the thesis of a future Antichrist, which in the according to Daniel 9 described 70th year week become active. To do this, he simply cut off the last week of the year and put it in the future. This week the Antichrist will appear (the Bible says he will be revealed. However, this is to be understood as “given for knowledge” rather than upon his “appearance”).
He would make a covenant with many and cease food offerings and burnt offerings halfway through the week. Afterward, the Redeemer would appear, put an end to the Antichrist, and establish the 1,000-year kingdom on earth. The 70-year week in Daniel 9 clearly describes the actions of Jesus Christ, who was “cut off” after the 69th week and ended the sacrificial offerings (food offerings and burnt offerings) through his death on the cross in the middle (3.5 years) of the 70th week. Jesus himself was the final and unique sacrificial lamb. Ribera’s motive was clear. Even the first Protestants recognized the papacy as the Antichrist, whose spirit had already been described by Paul as already present in his time some 2,000 years earlier.
Interestingly, and also importantly, the Greek word “anti” was used only in the minority to mean “opposite” and by the majority to mean “instead of” (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti). It is well known who wants to be “instead of” Christ here on earth. It could not be explained more impressively than the statements of many “infallible” popes themselves. It couldn’t be explained more impressively than the statements of so many “infallible” popes themselves.
Pope Leo XIII. declared in his encyclical “Praeclara Gratulationis Puplicae” of June 20, 1894 “We hold the place of Almighty God on this earth”(https://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13praec.htm). Pope Innocent III. stated around 1200: “The Pope takes the place of the true God in this world” (*8. The political or worldly power took the papacy in the year 538 and “residents” since then in the same self-understanding.
Naturally, the idea was to divert attention from the “Papacy and Antichrist” realization. The future theory developed by Francisco Ribera fits very well with Jewish ideas. Their Messiah has not yet appeared; he is yet to come, and will then bring peace on earth, build the Third Temple, restore the Jews to Torah living according to the Torah, and also convince all other nations of the teachings. Here, in my opinion, lies the common denominator that will lead Christian and Jewish believers astray, hand in hand.
Exactly this thesis conveys e.g. in the USA Jonathan Chan (Messianic Jew), who in his speeches very often mentions “the coming Messiah, the (anointed) Jesus, the Jehushua” in one breath (sein Youtube-Kanal: https://www.youtube.com/user/bethisraelwayne.
The declared “common” Messiah was, at best, a privileged one of God, but by no means the Son of God, let alone His sacrificial death for the acceptance of our sins and thus the opening of a path to salvation through justification through His grace.
An impressive report by “Deutschlandfunk” in 2016 shows how “in the background” is actually arranged. It describes the role Jesus played in the Talmud before it was subjected to early censorship. The details are so intense that I don’t even want to repeat them here (Quelle: https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/erste-talmud-uebersetzung-als-sich-juden-und-christen-fremd.886.de.html?dram:article_id=360208).
Jesus’ unequivocal announcement in Isaiah 53 is considered a “red rag” in the synagogues.
Ribera’s “self-made prophecies” for the future are pure interpretations intended to take the papacy out of the line of fire, and therefore they are simply “handmade” prophecies. This so-called prophecy, coupled with the ideas of the Jewish faith, will now be fulfilled in a similarly hand-made way. The preparations have long been underway.
Donald Trump’s portrait, along with Cyrus, adorns an Israeli commemorative coin. Cyrus, the pioneer of the Second Temple, and Trump, the pioneer of the Third Temple. Such a “fulfillment of prophecy” is an enormous “gain for its credibility.” Not to be overlooked is the lion (symbol of Babylon) with a scimitar (“saber” from the Orient, a symbol of Islam, among other things). The “pre-rapture” associated with Ribera’s theses, even before the tribulation or the appearance of the Antichrist, could be particularly fatal.
This theory (propagated, among other things, by the Hollywood film “Left Behind,” starring Nicolas Cage) (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_Behind_(2014)) only concerns the Christian community. In this sequence, there is a second chance following the following (earthly) 1,000-year kingdom. For Jews, this is the opportunity for obedience to the Torah, and for Christians, this opportunity for “reflection.” But this second chance does not exist.
Regardless of the reality of some “Marian apparitions,” the one on August 17, 2000, in Assiut, Egypt, was particularly highlighted as a “blessing for both Muslims and Christians.” (Source: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marienerscheinung#Orte_von_Marienerscheinungen). At least there are already detailed visions (https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Heikle-Vision-article375870.html) of a “musical” gathering of Christians, Jews, and Muslims at the Third Temple in Jerusalem.
Yet I know for sure that the outcome, whatever it may look like, will be the completely wrong path to hopeless error. By denying Jesus Christ as the only way and, out of faith in the presented “fulfillment of prophecy,” in the necessary homage to a constructed “pseudo-god,” the mark of the beast on the forehead will, in my opinion, be accepted.
The simultaneous acceptance of the mark on the hand will likely follow automatically with zealous practice of the rituals (which will ultimately be enforced anyway). This whole thing is being established as a “saving hand” during the social disaster now looming in the wake of the “coronavirus measures” and later also “climate measures.” Thus, believers who follow the Scriptures will likely soon be identified as “dissidents” and, above all, “threats to the common good.” With all the consequences.
(*1 Picture: Bild: Lawrence Jackson, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
(*2 Picture: Jean-Jacques-François Le Barbier, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
(*3 Picture: CC BY-SA 3.0, Link
(*4 Picture: Von Odejea – Eigenes WerkFigures utilisée :Source du blasonnement, CC BY-SA 3.0
(*5 Picture li: Pixabay.com – Bild mi: Pixabay.com – Bild re: Von blues_brother – Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0
(*7 Source li: Pixabay.com – Bild re: Pixabay.com
