The Controlled “Golden Cage”

Deutsch

People’s supposed freedoms are found in corridors that are becoming ever narrower. To ensure that this controlled “golden cage” is not perceived as such, people’s education and thought structures have long since been improved.

The thinking of mankind has long been in the sights

The deeper one digs into the supposedly self-evident aspects of everyday life, the more pure fictions emerge. Having long since jumped from the frying pan into the fire, people find themselves far more than a foot deep in a purely fictitious dependency. Many even feel perfectly comfortable in what they perceive as a “golden cage,” because independent action has long since been discouraged, even “unthought.”

More appearance than reality

If, in the course of further research in the field of history, one comes across the term “federal states” in connection with “foundations,” this matter actually becomes truly interesting. This is certainly a reason for further digging. First of all: Such efforts to somehow and somewhere establish one’s own position are essentially useless. The structures that are portrayed in history books today as long-gone and now insignificant events not only still exert massive influence today, but over the centuries, like a cancer, have also expanded this influence into every single facet of society.

Anyone who wanted to proclaim their position “outside this system” would have to step back at least 1,700 years and assume the role of a “nature-loving druid.” Defining one’s position vis-à-vis the prevailing legal system, or the legal system in force at a given point in time, is like shifting from one tree to another within a dense forest without recognizing, let alone understanding, this forest as such, preferring instead to find a clearing. A small clearing in the forest is now the only way to avoid the desired “inclusion.” For the forest has long since become omnipresent.

The relevant history goes far(er) back

Historical research in Germany usually only extends slightly beyond 1913, in some cases to around 1840. To be fair, it must be acknowledged that the focus of historical research in mainstream schools ends with 1914. The preceding centuries receive more casual attention, with the mention of various events and prominent individuals. For example, a period of the “Holy Roman Empire” lasting a good 840 years is occasionally mentioned, which once received the additional attribute “German Nation.” Such historical events are linked to a beginning via “Otto,” an end via “Napoleon,” and perhaps also to the migrations of peoples, as well as the “initial spark” of Charlemagne. The latter is still held in high esteem by the proud recipients of the Charlemagne Prize.

Different focus in the story

It thus seems natural and therefore strange that the great, decisive battle in the Teutoburg Forest in 9 AD was named after the magnificent loser Varus (Battle of the Teutoburg Forest) and not after his opponent and winner Arminius (“The Traitor”). The praises of Charlemagne also seem very strange in light of the massacre he wreaked among the peoples of Central Europe at the time, especially the Saxons. Charlemagne achieved his final victory over the Saxons, who had until then resisted “forced Catholicization,” through deception and ambush. This culminated in the final slaughter of the Saxon princes present.

Both historical events have something in common, and that is Rome. While Varus, in the self-image of the ancient Roman emperor, sought to protect the interests of the Roman Empire as a “protecting power,” Charlemagne slaughtered the people in the name of the Catholic Church, which by then ruled Rome and is now the “Mother of all Churches.” Charlemagne was rewarded for his fervent commitment with his coronation as emperor at Christmas in 800 AD by the “Bishop of Rome” and “Pontifex Maximus,” Pope Leo III.

“But that was a long time ago and has nothing to do with today’s circumstances”, that’s one possible assumption. Is that actually the case?

Current example of the “oddities”

Such examples of taken-for-granted oddities can still be seen today. Every “elected” and therefore temporarily “important” politician begins the justification of his political decisions with the formula: “I believe that…” It’s not knowledge that counts, but apparently belief in a cause. A single creed, which, however, is sold as an irrefutable fact and even leaves open the option of being able to evade responsibility after obvious failure by invoking this pure “belief.”

Aside from the long-established carte blanche for any action in the “name of the party” by setting appropriate standards(StGB §129, Absatz 3, BGB §54 –> PartG §37).

Political parties are usually classified as “unincorporated associations” (Bundeswahlleiter), but only incidentally. The findings of the so-called science (actually opinion) are mainly based only on their intellectual wish-creations. Their research results, which have been put on paper, are teeming with subjunctive moods.

These constructs, treated as fact, in turn form the basis for further “scientific” findings and also decisions in politics and theology. Money, recognition, media coverage, fame, awards, etc. are the decisive tools for such compliance. Corruption is omnipresent. Scientists who deviate from the fictions are deprived of their jobs and thus their income and livelihood at a stroke. Coupled with defamation, slander, and public doubts about their mental health, lasting social destruction is virtually certain. How did it come to this, that so-called scientists come up with such crude theories and the general public even takes them at face value?

“Learning against learning”

Anyone who wanted to change this miserable situation would be handed a pretty bad hand. Society would first have to understand this system. However, appropriate “educational measures” were initiated long ago to counter such findings. For centuries, this approach has followed the principle of “learning against learning” and has long since affected all levels of education worldwide, from kindergarten to universities. It was most recently “rolled out on a large scale” in the mid-1990s through a binding “curriculum” by UNESCO (Info). The goals include, among other things, the recognition of created fictitious values ​​as truth, the trained doubting of absolute facts, and the resulting fruitless discussions.

The compliant media provides powerful support through repetition, repetition, and above all, repetition. Added to this are the artful elaborations of created case studies from everyday life. The “new truth” must be poured into people’s minds and cemented there. The creation of around 60 different fictional genders is just one of the numerous examples.

The motto “learning against learning” has its origin in the following “instructions”:
“The thirteenth and final [rule] is that we shall all agree with the consensus of the Church in wanting to define as black what to our eyes appears white. So that in all things we may [ new] truth, we should adopt the firm principle of taking what I see as white to be black, if the Hierarchical Church so defines it.“

Ignatius V. Loyola provided the template

This principle is Rule #13 in “Spiritual Exercises”.
(Ignatianische Exerzitien, https://archive.org/details/a588350800loyouoft/page/n229/mode/2up)
by Ignatius of Loyola, published in 1548. Loyola was the main founder of the Society of Jesus (Jesuits) in 1534 and at the same time its first General Superior. This alone shows that this is not a spiritual order for “spiritual refreshment”, but an order with military structures. The “Societas Jesu” (abbreviation: SJ) was approved by Pope Paul III. in 1540.

Anyone who believes that this “antiquarian” point of view has long since entered the anecdotes of history is greatly mistaken. These educational instructions were taken up by the educator and philosopher Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762-1814), among others. (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Gottlieb_Fichte), who, among other things, took the view that education should primarily aim at destroying one’s own will. For this purpose, individual “pilot projects” were started in several universities to research the best method. Declaring something obviously “white” as “black” and defending this point of view by all means requires such a broken will.

Ignatian practices bear (rotten) fruits

So it’s not surprising that “scientists” like Volkmar Sigusch
(https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkmar_Sigusch)
the two natural sexes male and female (apart from biologically based intersex) into a mere matter of definitions. In spiritual effort according to Loyola, the sexes of the newborn are no longer ascertained but defined. In this case, this fictitious “truth” was labeled “Cis-Gender”. A pure thought construct, which should be planted in people’s minds as an absolute truth. The size of the supporters of these theses is remarkable.

By the way, definition fiction: “A non-existent fact which is treated as existing“.

The problem with a fiction is the impossibility of counter-proof. The story that the wolf ate the grandmother simply needs to be planted in children’s minds as truth, so that as an adult, they have no chance of success with mere counterarguments and no possibility of proof. In this example, one’s own life experience as they grow up will have a cleansing effect, but not in cases where this fiction is constantly perpetuated by politics, the media, and ultimately society itself. The latter will also brand the “deviants” of such an ingrained fiction with increasing anger.

Isaac D’Israeli denounced it long ago

This supposed educational strategy based on the breaking of will was already taken up by Isaac D’Israeli, disclosed in his book “Amenities of Literature” in 1841
(https://archive.org/details/amenitieslitera08disrgoog/page/n434/mode/2up).
It goes without saying that this work received little attention, let alone is used as compulsory reading in educational institutions. The representatives (victims) of this strategy and the media are trying with all their might to avoid any deviation, even just questioning with all conceivable ones means to fight. Accompanied by repetition, repetition and repetition of the newly created fictional “truths”. After all, this general degeneration of education hasn’t progressed enough to sell “electricity-storing power lines” or “imps in batteries” as the new truth.

A generation change is needed for this. However, this is hard to come by, as can be seen from the young people courted by politicians and the media, for example in the areas of environmental and climate protection. The UN and its affiliated institutions provided strong support (Info).

What is the motive for this spiritual destruction?

First of all: True faith must be eradicated, no matter what the cost.
The founding year 1534 of the “Society of Jesus” (SJ) is no coincidence. After the theology professor, and from Rome’s point of view the “heretic” Martin Luther, denounced the machinations of the Roman Church (initially with 95 theses in 1517) and also practiced the “heresy”, the Bible as the only basis of faith (Sola Scriptura) to explain, Loyola obviously felt compelled to initiate appropriate countermeasures. The so-called counter-reformation was initiated. This became all the more explosive when Luther also translated the Bible into German and the writings were quickly distributed thanks to the printing press that had already been invented.

The monopoly of Roman Catholic dogma was broken. The “sheep” of the Catholic Church had previously been forbidden to own their own Bible. This was evidently due to the fear that people might notice the dogmas of Catholic teachings that massively deviated from the Bible. After all, the “protected sheep” also firmly believed in Purgatory, established solely by Rome. A place where sins already forgiven by the priesthood of the self-authorized church must still be paid for (“burned away”).

A site in which the priesthood of the self-empowered Catholic Sins forgiven by the church still have to be paid off (“burned off”). Rome also presumes that God has to submit to the decisions of the priests. According to cath. Dogmas through the purchase of so-called letters of indulgence. An extremely lucrative source of money, first in the area of ​​responsibility of the priests, then of the bishops and, due to the massive flood of money, ultimately directly of the pope.

Excommunication & Interdict were powerful weapons

Since the Vatican has successfully suppressed the truth under threat and even execution of the death penalty, it is easy to understand why the excommunication of a ruler and his people led to considerable turmoil within that country. A very good example of this is the Norman King of England, John I, and his friction with Rome at the beginning of the 13th century.

Here the excommunication of the king and the interdict (“church strike”) against his people were enough to transfer ownership of the “crown” to Rome via the Knights Templar.

Of course, this was done from the point of view of the “protective power of the Vatican”. “British Library” provides good information on the subject of “Magna Carta” and the consequences that continue to this day. (https://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/videos/king-john-and-the-origins-of-magna-carta)

Catholic church on campaign of extermination

The extermination of religious denominations deviating from Catholic teachings, which primarily affected the literate peoples, began relatively shortly after the papacy seized power in Rome. The Waldensians and Albigensians were among the first victims of Rome’s widespread campaign of extermination. This was followed by the “holy” Inquisition (“interrogation,” hence pure cynicism), with countless other cruelly tortured and executed people.

That these mass exterminations did not bring about Rome’s final victory over the true faith was demonstrated by the unspeakable continuation of the slaughter, culminating in the murder of tens of thousands of Huguenots on St. Bartholomew’s Day in France in 1572, i.e., already after the beginning of the Reformation and also after the founding of the Jewish Youth. The latter likely recognized the hopelessness of the satanic approach and probably also feared a decline in acceptance within society.

Different thinking, different society

So society had to be changed by changing the way people think. Ultimately, the sole goal is to turn people away from the true faith and toward the dogmas of the Catholic Church, and people’s weaknesses, such as greed for power and money, envy, and resentment, could be wonderfully exploited for this purpose. After infiltrating governments and educational institutions, these compliant tools for the implementation of these plans could be produced on an assembly line.

“Useful idiots” in their time, and once their use has been exhausted, merely “useless idiots.” Abandoned or eliminated, their loyalty directed solely to Rome. The medieval-looking Inquisition, however, remains a very active branch of the Catholic Church even in the 21st century. It has simply been given a different label: the “Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.”

A prominent representative was Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, later Pope Benedict XVI. He was Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, appointed by then-Pope John Paul II. Ratzinger was thus the “Chief Inquisitor.” Naturally, the burning at the stake remained unhealed. This was not due to “good will,” however, but rather to the still not entirely healed wound of the deprivation of political power in 1798.

The first healing of this wound inflicted by Napoleon Bonaparte occurred on February 11, 1929, with the founding of Vatican City State. However, this event, in connection with the then dictator Benito Mussolini, is rarely highlighted. The complete healing of the wound, and thus the regaining of control over the scepter and globe, could occur as early as 2021, with the Vatican also establishing its second foothold in Washington’s political center.

The wound is healing – the world looks on in amazement

Pope Francis, the first pope in US history, gave the go-ahead for this final step with his appearance in the US Capitol (https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/25/us/pope-francis-congress-speech.html) to the US Congress on September 24, 2015. The world would then have the same conditions in official form as in the Middle Ages, but in a modern version adapted to the “Zeitgeist”.

The “church ambitions” in this regard can be read in the encyclicals “Laudato si'” (2015) and “Fratelli Tutti” (2020). Very topical again that of Pope Leo XIII. published “sensational” encyclical “Rerum Novarum” in 1891. The social teaching of the Catholic Church will affect us all. The starting signal has already been given and will be executed with the help of the World Economic Forum. “The Great Reset” (https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/), wrapped and decorated with climate protection programs and economic phrases.

The Roman Catholic Church is poised to regain its position as it was in the Middle Ages, but with a modern label and “contemporary” legislation. The church decides and politics as well as economy carry out.

There is still a lot to come for mankind. The World Economy Forum (WEF) leads the vision that no one will own anything anymore and still be happy. A controlled golden cage like in the book. However, this development is not a modern phenomenon, but was largely prepared a long time ago.