A wave of indignation is breaking over Pope Francis. Until recently, the pontiff was still considered “homo-friendly”. Now the head of the church is the symbol of “homophobia” par excellence. He doesn’t want to admit homosexuals to the seminary. But it is precisely because of this “tolerance-drunk” crowd that the Jesuit can sit back and sit back contentedly.
Inhalt / Content
A fodder for outrage
Pope Francis cleared his throat the wrong way and the Catholic following is freaking out once again. Apparently due to a lack of meaningful employment, Catholic and non-Catholic “outrage circles” that feel called upon to do so are getting upset about an alleged contradiction by the “Holy Father”. The term “tolerance”, which has now become completely distorted and often misused, can also serve its purpose in this wave of fake rage.
The press cheered when Pope Francis said “fatherly” about a homosexual believer in 2013, shortly after the beginning of his pontificate: “Who am I to condemn him?” (Source). He seeks God and shows a “good will” (“good will” – Roman Catholic flex definition). The Pope had thus earned himself a bonus.
The wave has started
Now a great cry of horror. Pope Francis expressed his opposition to homosexuals in the priesthood at a meeting with a delegation of around 200 bishops from Italy. Applicants should not even be admitted to training, according to the report from the Jesuit magazine “America – The Jesuit Review” (Source).
The Pope’s choice of words here seems to be a hit, because the Italian word “froci” would be used to mean “faggot” in German. It is obvious, completely ignoring the opinion or language usage of a local ethnic group, that this choice of words is written in capital letters on the flag of denunciation.
The announcement was not an official press release, but rather information that had been punctured. The press pounced on it and blamed it on the public on social media, much to the delight of the professional outragers. Of course you remind the Pope of his former words, but you probably don’t see it very clearly in the context, because Francis mentioned in the new version in 2013, “Who am I to condemn them?” The one homosexual that was addressed at the time has now become a plural and with it the global scene.
Homophobia is the now worn-out slogan. There is no differentiation at all. In 2013, Francis spoke about a single believer who was searching for God. On Monday, the pontiff spoke about the alleged “homosexual offspring” in the priesthood. A “subtle” difference and a conviction that would contradict the statement from 2013 cannot be seen either. No matter, the concentrated indignation is still shouted out.
Misunderstood tolerance
By the way, the term tolerance means “to endure / endure something”. It has now been completely mutilated and accordingly misused as a verbal weapon. People who are used to outrage understand the term tolerance as “advocating/accepting something.” So the exact opposite, because it only makes sense to endure something if you actually reject it but don’t take any action against it. Tolerance is therefore an expression of rejection and at the same time tolerance.
The Pope won’t care
The extent to which the “new synapse knots” have developed in some people is shown by a lawsuit filed by a lawyer (!) who found it discriminatory that her daughter was not allowed to sing in a boys’ choir(Source).
What does Pope Francis have to fear now? Nothing, absolutely nothing. He and his brothers in the Jesuit Club can sit back contentedly and “enjoy their fruits.” The madness that has been instigated has already become self-perpetuating (Info).
Happy is the man that findeth wisdom, and the man that getteth understanding.
Proverbs 3:13
Bible verses from King James Version
