Right-wing Christians – Newly defined enemy of the “woken” churches

Deutsch

Partly guesswork and always intellectual-looking answers from the “woke-oriented” Protestant churches about the advanced development of “conservative-right Christianity”. A new “enemy” has been identified. However, if academic minds were to deal with prophecy, which can be found exactly where the “ecclesiastical clergy” only claim to be based on it, then all questions about the present and also the near future would be answered. Instead, ordinary camels are used to defame.

Clinging to the “Left” and “Right” narratives

The terms “left” and “right” have long since been expanded to include characteristics such as “woke” and “radical” that are treated as synonyms. No matter which camp you pay attention to, the opposing side is always referred to as “the spawn of evil”. The strategy of “Stop the thief” is the order of the day and only because of the broad media as arguing comrades, the “left faction” only receives a vote that only sounds like a majority. Regardless of the quality of the battles fought, it is the desired classic game
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (Info). Anyone who finds themselves in one of these two camps has made themselves a participant in this theatrical performance and is therefore actually to blame.

EKD churches feel called

The once Protestant churches under the German umbrella organization EKD are actively involved in everyday political events and always add boiling oil to the blazing fire. An institution that has long since fallen away from the gospel and is dedicated to the spread of paganism and spiritualism is visibly involved in the rainbow-colored, left-green activities using “spiritual” means. The leading figures of the EKD don’t find it particularly disturbing that a mass exodus of their sheep to be protected has long since begun. Because we are sticking to this queer course undeterred. This applies to “new Protestant theology” as well as to the tendency to have an important say at the political round table.

The blinders are so tight that those in charge of these supposed places of worship apparently have not yet understood that the majority of church refugees turn their backs on churches as quickly as possible, not out of unbelief, but out of faith. Anyone who, as a member of this church and as a believer in the gospel, compares the Bible and the pulpit will inevitably find themselves at Sunday service in an institution filled with unclean and hateful bird. (see Revelation 18:2). Of course, exceptions prove the rules. The pastor of the St. Martini parish in Bremen, Olaf Latzel, should be mentioned here. Because of his loyalty to the gospel, he is considered an extremely unpleasant polluter in the parent umbrella organization of the EKD. The attacks against Latzel are corresponding.

New enemy: “Right-wing extremist Christianity”

In the meantime, the “Christian institution” has identified a new “enemy”. Particularly in the USA, the attributes “right-wing” and “Christianity” seem to have already merged. There is a risk of it spilling over into Europe. Perfect splinter formation. A “Christian house” rails against “Christian attitudes”. Actually only suitable for satire, but still meant seriously. The journalist Liane Bednarz, described as a “liberal-conservative” published her book “The Fear Preachers. How right-wing Christians infiltrate society and churches”. In an interview with the EKD’s mouthpiece, evangelisch.de, Bednarz tries to explain what, in her view, are “right-wing or right-wing extremist positions”. (Source).

The focus of the conversation is (of course) the areas surrounding the political party AfD (right wing) and also the President of Russia, Vladimir Putin. Intersections are found, or better defined(?), between “right-wing, right-wing extremism, Christianity and politics”, just as those seem to deal with Islamism and “Muslim refugees”. The bottom line is that this conversation among basically like-minded people does not contain any new versions that would lure a dog out from behind the stove. The usual, socialist-tinged, rhetorical pablum, decorated with standardized trigger words like “gender and xenophobia.”

The Christian-sounding topics in the conversation contained the usual borrowings of various biblical keywords, such as mercy and charity, which are rubbed under the noses of the “right-wingers” with automatic habit. The only question that arose was whether the apologists of these well-sounding rules even understand that they are basically celebrating a cheap copy of Pope Francis’ encyclical Fratelli Tutti. Their demands, care across all borders, including invitations including travel and chauffeur, are nowhere to be found in the Bible.

“Misunderstanding” of biblical statements

Even the example of the Good Samaritan told by Jesus Christ described the individual case of a person in acute need with one-off assistance and the option of a one-off financial increase for the carer. Nowhere did Jesus Christ call for all Samaritans and residents of other countries to be brought into the country in order to provide almost unlimited benefits regardless of a needs test. The opposite is actually the case, and has been since the people of Israel wandered in the desert. “Separate yourselves from others” and “do not enter into marriages with other peoples”, “stay away from paganism” are the repeated urgent requests. Raising a warning finger at this point and citing charity and mercy is simply the self-portrayal of an exemplary do-gooder while at the same time misusing the gospel.

“For the poor always ye have with you,” said Jesus Christ in John 12:8. With this He said that there will always be poverty somewhere (as long as this world exists). To them, so to speak the front door, it is important to help locally. Jesus neither called for importing poverty nor exporting the willingness to help, let alone for global “social justice” as the “chief saint” in Rome demands The “equality” demanded by the Roman Catholic Church at the popular level according to communism and a leadership of a few top politicians and business according to fascism does not correspond to God’s order.

A game ball from the Loyola fraternity

Es werden alles Anfechten, Angreifen, Anätzen nichts helfen. Die einst evangelischen Kirchen nehmen in ihrer Position gegenwärtig die Rolle eines Schizophrenen ein. Auf einer Fahnenseite das “Christentum” geschrieben, auf der anderen Seite die “queer-bunten” Exzesse des Säkularismus. Womöglich ohne es zu bemerken, lassen sich die selbstverliebten Stimmen dieser Kirche von den “Ignatianischen Think-Tanks Roms” wie ein willfähriges Ruder benutzen, nur um das Hegel’sche Spiel in der gewünschten Richtung zu halten. Auf diese Kirche wartet das Schicksal einer fallen gelassenen heißen Kartoffel, aber schon zerrissen, bevor es den Boden erreicht hat.

The so-called “Christian Right” is no closer to the gospel than the “Woke” clique. It just looks more Christian, but it is the philosophy of Rome. The pursuit of power is one of the declared intentions of the “Christian formations” in the USA. From the rain in the eaves. The players in one of the two camps are so ideologically blind that they are unable to recognize the ugly game itself.

North King and South King

In the prophetic sense of Daniel chapter 11, two great powers play a major role. They fight against each other, economically, politically and also militarily. The North King and the South King (more info). While the northern king in antiquity was clearly the great power Babylon, the southern king was ancient Egypt. At that time. But Daniel 11 also clearly deals with “the time of the end”.

In the Anti-Typos one finds the northern king as a major religious power and thus the papacy, which was already identified as God’s earthly adversary (Info). Exactly the mirror image of the ancient and completely destroyed ancient Babylon.
In ancient Egypt, Tutmosis III was the powerful pharaoh at the time of Israel’s exodus. He is considered in history to be the most powerful of his guild. However, he rejected the admonishing words of Moses, who reported God’s will that Israel should leave Egypt. “Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice to let Israel go? I know not the LORD, neither will I let Israel go.” said Tutmosis III (Exodus 5:2). Pharaoh rejected the God of the Bible. Therefore, Egypt is a symbol of atheism in the anti-typos of the present, i.e. the southern king.

Daniel 11 in the present

The end-time scenario described in Daniel 11 and the serious conflicts between the northern king and the southern king are nothing other than the battle between “right” and “left” that can now be observed very well, with the attributes “Christian” and “atheistic” now included. A war between ideologies. The southern king will prevail for a time, but the tide will turn Daniel 11:40-42:
“And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over. He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon. He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt shall not escape.“

“chariots, horsemen, many ships .. enter, overflow, pass over .. Egypt shall not escape”. This looks like a smooth victory for the northern king over the southern king. Religious triumphs over atheism. “Religious” in no way means Christianity according to the gospel. But the theology of Rome. Daniel himself describes what is very special about this great game: “And both these kings’ hearts shall be to do mischief, and they shall speak lies at one table; but it shall not prosper” (Daniel 11:27). A thoroughly rigged game. A big “show” within the Hegelian game for the “herding” of the masses. Controlled by the “faithful beast” of Rome according to Revelation 13, the USA (Info).

Surprising developments

Actually just a supposed surprise, because it fits exactly into the scheme. In this increasingly visible development of “Christianized politics,” an unexpected prime example is provided by someone who one would probably least have expected. Richard Dawkins. A professor of biology, “full-blooded atheist”, the media focuses on him based on his book “The God Delusion”, published in 2006. Dawkins gives the impression that he is waging a real war against every religion. “I am not attacking a particular version of God or gods. I am against God, all gods, everything supernatural, no matter where and when it was invented or is still being invented,” said the professor .

His statement in the second chapter of his book about what he thinks about the God of the Old Testament actually leaves no doubt about his “subtle rejection”:
“The God of the Old Testament is – it can justifiably be said – the most unpleasant figure in all of literature: He is jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, resentful surveillance fanatic; a vengeful, bloodthirsty ethnic Cleaner; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, child and people-murdering, disgusting, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, moody-vicious tyrant.“

This very professor recently announced that he was in favor of Christianity due to the rise of political Islamism. However, he emphasized not to take up the religious aspect, but only the cultural one. In an interview with LBC, he would describe himself as a “cultural Christian”. (Youtube). To call this a transformation would be a bit of an exaggeration. Nevertheless, one is amazed at his concession to a religion he thoroughly “hates.”

That fits the scheme completely

“Well, well!” you wanted to say. But it just fits too well to call Dawkins’ “miraculous transformation” a real surprise. A “Christian” appeal from a “southern king-state member”. Dawkins inadvertently clarifies what the mark described in Revelation 13 actually represents (Info). With this attitude he is a model candidate of how to accept the mark “in the hand”, and of his own free will, without any coercion. He doesn’t care about religion at all, it doesn’t interest him at all, but he is willing to take part in one or another “Christian” tradition because of the cultural contribution. The believer accepts the mark on his forehead, the “cultural follower” attaches the mark to his hand.

All that’s left is the starting signal

The cards are expected to be reshuffled after the conclusion of the next US presidential election in 2024 and the determination of the next head of government from 2025. The “right-wing Christians” are positioned. The USA itself, the geopolitical arm of the northern king, is prepared. The first precedent rulings were made in the USA by the Supreme Court in favor of “Christianity”. (Info). And the Republican government program has long been drawn up and ready for use (Info). Whether serious social upheavals are on the horizon, especially in the USA and Europe, will soon be answered. “Ordo ab Chao”. All that was missing was the starting signal.

Bible verses from King James Version