Noah’s Laws for the World – Court of Justice Planned

Deutsch

The so-called Seven Laws of Noah (Noahide Commandments) are being brought back into focus. Moral standards, interpreted according to post-Babylonian influences, are to be enforced at the political level. The “newly created Sanhedrin” has written an open letter to US President Trump.

The “seven universal commandments”

The Seven Commandments of Noah can be found in Judaism and are intended to apply to every person. Non-Jews also have the opportunity to secure a place in the “coming world” as so-called “Zaddik” (righteous) by following the Noahide commandments. The Seven Commandments of Noah are explained in the Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 13. The Noahide commandments are also contained in the Torah (Books of Moses), in Genesis 9:1-13. At this point God enters into a covenant with Noah (Info).

In the Talmud, Noah’s seven commandments are defined as follows:

• Prohibition of murder
• Prohibition of theft
• Prohibition of idolatry
• Prohibition of fornication
• Prohibition of eating the flesh of living animals
• Prohibition of blasphemy
• Establishment of jurisdiction to enforce these regulations

Coverage only possible to a limited extent

Murder, theft and idolatry are also clearly defined in the 10 Commandments of God (Exodus 20 – Info).

The prohibition of fornication can also be found in several places in the Gospel. However, a distinction must be made here as to whether fornication refers to physical intercourse between people (e.g. Leviticus 21:9, Numbers 25:1), or the term for false idols in ancient Israel in the many phases of its history (e.g. Ezekiel 23:49). There are other examples in the New Testament, but this part of the Bible does not exist in Judaism.

The prohibition against eating the flesh of living animals is also a commandment from God. Meat must not be eaten as long as it still contains blood, because life is in the blood (Genesis 9:4). This also applies to the general dietary laws, specifically the prohibition against eating unclean animals. (Info).

Blasphemy is related to the Third Commandment, not to blaspheme the name of the Lord. But this term leaves a lot of room for definition. If the Pharisees were known for anything in the period after the Babylonian exile, it was for creating mountains of self-defined, human laws. This particularly applies to determining what is clean and what is unclean and how to behave on the Sabbath.

Establishment of a (human) jurisdiction

While some laws can be derived from the passage Genesis 9:1-13, the last “paragraph” of the Seven Laws of Noah appears to be particularly interesting. It is about the legal enforcement of the previous six positions of the Noahide commandments. The establishment of a jurisdiction. In line with the punishments imposed on ancient Israel for violating legal provisions, this could also lead to the same executions being adopted again, i.e. stoning.

After all, it was the Pharisees, the High Council, the High Priest, who were very quick to stone people, even according to the New Testament. They repeatedly raised stones against Jesus Christ with their hands, but Jesus was able to escape each time. They dragged a woman who was caught red-handed in adultery. They stoned Stephen to death, they also stoned Peter, but he survived.

The unspeakably inflated code of law of the Pharisees also provided for appropriate punishments for each transgression, and the High Council had a strong say in this matter. The High Council is also called the “Sanhedrin” and still exists as a “new foundation”. It is this Sanhedrin that interprets the plans expressed by US President Donald Trump to “acquire” the completely bombed Gaza Strip in order to revive it as a sign of the imminent arrival of the Messiah. It is obvious that this Messiah is not Jesus Christ.

Religion and State on One Rope

The core concern cannot be overlooked. It is the renewed connection between church and state, or religion and state power. Just as the Sanhedrin at the time of Jesus was not permitted to carry out any death sentence within the area of ​​​​the power of Rome unless it was given the green light, in the future the moral guidelines of religion should also be enforced using state laws. This concern is therefore on a par with the efforts of the Roman Catholic Church and also represents a parallel to the Sharia of Islam. They are more or less in agreement on this.

Spiritual leadership of the world

Trump is eager to incorporate the morality of religion into his state affairs. To this end, the President recently created a “Faith Office” for the White House. The Sanhedrin is all for this and wrote an open letter to the US President on February 12, 2025. (Source). Darin wird die dringende Notwendigkeit betont, den “universellen Moralkodex” für das öffentliche Leben zur “spirituellen Führung der Welt” umzusetzen.

Diesen universellen Moralcodex ist definiert aus:

• One God – The cause of all causes (Genesis 1:1)
• One first man – Fundamental equality of humanity (Genesis 1:26)
• One basic law – Universally valid principles of justice (Genesis 2:16)

Principles of justice, derived from Genesis 2:16:
“And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:”

At this point, you have to dig very deep in the hope of finding a reference to justice and equality. Rather, this fragment from the whole package is suitable for simply ignoring God’s explicit prohibition against eating from the tree of knowledge.

Congruent with the moral guidelines of the Roman Church

This representation is very reminiscent of Roman Catholic social teaching, recently repeatedly emphasized in particular by Pope Francis’ encyclical “Fratelli Tutti”. The social encyclical “Rerum novarum” by Pope Leo XIII was the beginning and was again brought to the fore at the Second Vatican Council. The Apostolic Constitution “Gaudium et spes” shows the consistent reliance of social teaching on natural law according to Hellenistic philosophy. Also expressly emphasized in the Compendium of Social Teaching. The bottom line is that it is Aristotle and not the Gospel.

The Sanhedrin makes more of the permission to eat from the trees of the Garden of Eden than it actually contains. Genesis 2:16 is a reference to the “seven universal laws” and also reflects the 10 Commandments. The Sanhedrin’s letter to Trump also openly states what the core of the issue is: ecumenism. The legislation at Mount Sinai is a “divine revelation” for the monotheistic traditions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

The cat out of the bag

The open letter not only consists of a “hymn of praise” for the religiously ambitious US president, but also contains an invitation to attend a meeting of rabbis at the Sanhedrin court in Jerusalem. The agenda includes the creation of an “International Divine Court (IDC)” for all nations. This court is to be based on the seven universal commandments given by Noah and reaffirmed at Mount Sinai. For “global peace and divine justice”.

The two witnesses in the sackcloth

It’s getting exciting. The two witnesses (Revelation 11 – Info) are still doing their work of spreading the gospel according to (true) law and the prophets. The beast from the bottomless pit, in its diverse form but clearly of a state-political nature, is slowly emerging. The concerns of the “newly created Sanhedrin” are in principle identical with the aspirations of the papacy. There is therefore agreement on this.

It will come as it is announced. The beast from the abyss will kill the two witnesses, thus prohibiting the spread of the true gospel. This beast carries the whore of Babylon (Revelation 17 – Info) and will gain global dominance, the 10 kings will give their power to this beast, and the persecution of the rest who keep the (true) commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ will begin (Revelation 12:17).

The observable efforts and developments fit seamlessly with the predictions of the Bible’s prophecies. The only surprising thing is the paths and details that are taken. But only the result counts and the way things are, it won’t be long before the first “offers” are followed by the constraints. (mark of the beast).

Does the name Jesus Christ appear anywhere in the letter to the “Christian” Trump? Of course not. And that is exactly what describes the trend. Everything is possible, but never the acceptance of Jesus Christ and his monopoly position as the way, the truth and the life (John 14:6).

Bible verses from King James Version (1611)