Theory of Evolution – An Unnoticed Religion for Atheists?

Deutsch

The theory of evolution, actually just a hypothesis, is a “holy grail” in a society dominated by science. Any contradiction is to be nipped in the bud. The reactions are correspondingly fierce. It is evidently a religion for (supposed) atheism.

Strong headwinds to be expected

It is sometimes impressive how vehemently and sometimes aggressively the evolution hypothesis (“theory”) is defended, including whole packages of (attempted) insults and attacks. If you speak out against the evolutionary story with verifiable arguments, then the “tolerance” that is often demanded is quickly over. You become a target of verbal arrows and knives.

Why exactly? Does one take away some of the quality of life of the followers of the theory of evolution, or even a single slice of sausage from their sandwich, if one does not believe in the “Origin of Species” brought into the world by Charles Darwin, a trained theologian and amateur biologist?

The irrefutable entropy

The argument that essentially sweeps away the evolution hypothesis from the outset is the natural law of thermodynamics. The second sentence of this law, also called entropy, causes the story of the emergence of life from dead matter to collapse like a house of cards. Entropy is a quantity that describes the disorder or balance of energy.

This natural law applies everywhere in the universe. Therefore, the supposed counter-argument that entropy is a phenomenon only in closed systems and that the environment is an open system does not apply. Cosmology describes a finite universe and therefore speaks of a closed system in the dimension of the universe.

The sun actually plays an essential role. Without the sun’s energy, there would be no life. That’s true. There is just one big catch to the theory that “the sun gives life”. Entropy ensures that matter left to itself cannot organize. In addition, there is another law of nature that states that information can never arise from (dead) matter. It inevitably requires an intelligent sender. Reproduction and development based on DNA are pure information.

As disorder or balance increases, entropy also increases. When something is organized or structured, i.e. more order is created, entropy decreases.

Only living or “functioning” organized matter is able to use solar energy to create structures. A tree illuminated by the sun absorbs the energy and uses it through photosynthesis to extract the necessary building material carbon (from CO2) from the air for the construction of the trunk, branches, leaves, flowers and fruit. The “mess” becomes something organized. The entropy thus decreases.

A broken branch or a torn leaf is separated from the cycle of the “functioning” tree. They die. Here, however, the solar energy has the opposite effect. Like a dead stone, the branch and leaf are only heated, the disorder increases and decay begins. An increase in entropy.

The sun therefore does not give or create life, but rather sustains life. The initial spark of life must therefore necessarily be of a completely different nature.

Paradox is obvious

At this point, the fundamental problem with the origin of life according to the evolutionary hypothesis becomes apparent. At some point, somehow, by chance, the necessary, exclusively left-handed amino acids came together in the same place, at the same time, and also assembled in the necessary correct constellation to form the first life in the form of a cell. That is the hypothesis.

This theory is a blatant violation of the second law of thermodynamics, because these amino acids are dead matter and are exposed to solar energy and are therefore doomed to increase their entropy. They have simply warmed up and are exposed to decay. Structuring or coming together to form a higher order in the form of a cell, however, reduces entropy. But this is only possible for living or “functioning” organisms. Amino acids are not that.

Further impossibilities

There are also other paradoxes that make these stories about the origin of life according to Darwin and his followers impossible. The formulated “primordial soup” in which life is supposed to have originated could not have been too dense to allow the sun’s energy to pass through. So the amino acids could only be found on the surface of the “primordial soup”. But there was still no oxygen in the atmosphere. This means that there could not have been any ozone either. This ozone layer is in turn necessary to block the so-called hard cosmic rays. Such rays are extremely harmful, even destructive for amino acids.

In short: Nothing fits together in the hypothesis formulated about the origin of first life. This, in turn, renders any discussion about the evolutionary change from species “A” to species “B” over a long period of time absurd. Because if the origin of the simplest life is already completely impossible, then more highly developed beings could never have developed from it.

Further evidence for the impossibility of a chain of pure coincidences for the creation of this world – here

A purely spiritual matter

The evolution hypothesis is a question of faith. At this point, it is permissible to consider whether the spiritual aspect is not the actual reason for the formulation of this believed impossibility.

The battle between good and evil, light and darkness, truth and lies, is a spiritual battle. The salvation of man through the grace of Jesus Christ based on faith is a spiritual matter. Can it therefore be that the condemnation of man also presupposes a spiritual aspect?

The ancient Hellenistic philosophers (e.g. Plato, Socrates, Aristotle) ​​still found themselves in a “world of gods” of pantheism. The polytheism that still leaves its clear traces today. However, there was a belief in false deities and thus the spiritual aspect was still present. This changed with the emergence of atheism in the course of the 18th century. The “smart guys” such as Kant, Hegel and Voltaire placed great emphasis on the “wisdom” of the ancient philosophers, but formulated the “reason of man” independently of any deities. Atheism arose from the spiritual belief in God. This in turn gave rise to materialism and the many intermediate structures.

Question of Faith – Evolution Theory a Religion

The spiritual aspect disappeared with atheism. The hypothesis about the origin of life as a result of evolutionary developments is perfectly capable of filling this vacuum. Belief in something that is even demonstrably impossible. The formulated theory of evolution is therefore nothing more than a “religion for atheists”. One only has to believe in this fiction. This would restore the spiritual aspect. And the “best thing” is that the believers in evolution who call themselves atheists do not even notice that they have succumbed to a religion.

Another “side effect” of the evolution hypothesis brought into the world by the adversary is the mockery of the Creator. He created man in His own image. According to the evolution hypothesis, man would look like the joint processes of man and ape.

This could also be the reason why this hypothesis is defended with sometimes enormous aggressiveness. People are practically “broken on the wheel, stretched” and put on the “pyre” if they do not agree with the “evolution catechism”. The parallels to the customs in the “Dark Middle Ages” are therefore probably not coincidental (Revelation 13:4).

Bible verses from King James Version (1611)