The events of the past centuries up to the present have long been described or announced, from rough outlines to individual details. All of this in an ancient book, which, due to massive influences, is mainly regarded as just a collection of fairy tale stories.
Inhalt / Content
Breaks or restructuring of society and other political decisions are usually announced publicly. Hardly anyone is looking. Thus, statements on the “restructuring of society” are also obvious and can be viewed by everyone at any time on the basis of the respective publications. The “initiators” openly explain their agenda and, as always, according to the motto: “We told you so”. The “Council for Inclusive Capitalims” published a video on December 11, 2020 that breaks down exactly what the “wishes” are. The head of this council is Lynn Forester de Rothschild. The appearance and content of this 6-minute post are unmistakable. The message, which is announced by a member of the richest family on this planet, can also be understood as a “bad joke”. The tenor of the statement is that there are too many poor people with very few very rich people. Key statements are sometimes “social justice”, “solidarity”, “religious association” and “social basic income”, provided with the label of “free development of the potential of each individual”. (Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJoXwh0Vu9M ). Anyone can see this post and draw their own conclusions from it.
The principle is always the same and affects the political level as well as the theological one. The motto is: “Anyone could know”. Who looks at the Federal Gazette regularly? (published laws, bundesanzeiger.de), on the Bundestag agenda (bundestag.de/tagesordnung) and in other publicly available information from the public sector? The media only report what is “acceptable” and also in the form of “what you need to know about it”, if anything is discussed at all. You have to take it like the display board in the town hall (registry office) or in the courthouse. The posting of information is considered published and therefore public. The obligation to deliver would then be fulfilled and anyone who still doesn’t know has just missed their obligation to collect. Therefore, even the ignorant can justifiably be assumed to be voluntarily or accepting the matter. This is how it is handled in the legal system and this is also the ubiquitous principle. Also understandable in a way, since otherwise a corresponding notification would have to be sent to the individual households after each new standard or regulation.
However, “strange” is the call on all citizens to abide by the law, and if they question it critically, they are declared “too stupid” to be able to understand the legal texts at all. Conversely, how is anyone supposed to proclaim their own abidance by the law if they don’t have an overview of the entire now inflated set of rules?
Here people’s convenience and lack of time is exploited, their everyday lives are filled with entertainment (meaning “keep down”) and they are also happy to frighten them with alarmism. Everything is detrimental to finding the truth and its now almost insurmountably complex connections.
The “worldly” consequences for each individual usually also bring about “worldly” disadvantages, but would be irrelevant in relation to responsibility or justification towards God. But the paths of deception, with the aim of separating people from God, have long been entered and also forced. This affects the theological level in the direct sense as well as the general society in terms of thinking, beliefs, values and education. A hand was already laid on this point very early on in the course of the Counter-Reformation. The hunt for dissenters from the Catholic catechism, which led to the destruction of the Albigensians, Cathars and Waldensians even before the Reformation, as well as St. Bartholomew’s Night, which the Vatican once celebrated, and other “campaigns” were not able to destroy Protestantism. With the translation and distribution of the Bible into German, the suppression of the truth came to a (temporary) end.
Massive countermeasures were used to contain Protestantism in Europe, but it actually encouraged its spread throughout the world. The Huguenots fled to South Africa and the first settlers in the “New World” were mostly Protestants. They could practice their Protestant faith undisturbed in their new home without being persecuted as heretics (deviators from the Catholic catechism) and sometimes even murdered. What Martin Luther, who, in addition to the first German-language translation of the New Testament, also introduced the formation of the “general people”, already recognized as a danger, was ultimately actually implemented by the Vatican. If violence can’t lead to the goal, then education is the way to go. People’s thinking was attacked.
With enormous success. Society’s thinking was diverted away from faith and towards “humanism” and “common sense”. At the same time, efforts grew to discredit the Bible as untrustworthy and a collection of ancient fairy tales. The countries which at times were once fiercely defenders of Protestantism are now the countries with the largest proportion of atheists. For example Sweden and the Czech Republic (keyword: Jan Hus). However, the Vatican did not succeed in destroying the Bible. However, the Bible versions of more recent times must be treated with extreme caution, since the statements, some of which have been twisted into the opposite, have assumed large proportions.
How far people’s carelessness and uncritical acceptance of supposedly self-evident things has progressed can already be seen from an example.
The fascie (or fascia) is a symbol of fascism and had its heyday in the ancient Roman Empire.
I wonder why it doesn’t seem to be a problem at all that duplicates of this symbol sometimes adorn the wall behind the US Congressional lectern in the Capitol. Why is that so obvious? After all, someone must have thought about the choice and equipment. After all, the symbol fascia was also used extensively by Benito Mussolini for his fascism system that was set up at the time. (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fasci_italiani_di_combattimento)
The first official declaration of human rights after the French Revolution is also striking. In addition to the extremely visible fascia in the middle, the “spiritual fathers” of this explanation also took the example of Moses’ tablet of the law. All decorated with a snake biting its own tail, a Jacobean cap (Phrygian cap), a female angel and the pyramid with the eye at the zenith. After all, someone must have had a reason for this choice of symbols.
What is certain is that this has nothing to do with the gospel, even if this is what the tables of the law that are being placed behind Moses might suggest. So-called humanism, which arose from Hellenistic philosophy, has largely established itself to this day. Humanism also represents pure reason for the majority of people as a kind of substitute for religion, which is useful for “solidarity”, “social justice” and “common good”. However, a look at the theses of the declared human rights to this day very quickly reveals that they are in numerous positions diametrically opposed to God’s commandments.
The religious teaching carried out by the Catholic Church bears the label of the gospel, but is filled with a toxic mix of ancient Greek philosophy and Babylonian idolatry, within a structure based on Medo-Persia. In the period before 1798, the state enforced (including handing over the judgment to secular jurisdiction) of the Catholic dogmas based on Roman law. The doctrine, especially in relation to “God’s Mother Mary” (mother-child representation), the numerous sun symbols, the obelisks, etc., originate from the Babylonian or ancient Egyptian dogmas. For example, the top part of the obelisk of Tutmosis III. (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thutmosis_III.) Lateran Square in Rome, in front of the Vatican’s main church. What do Egyptian god symbols have to do with the gospel?
This constellation of different philosophies and dogmas of the historical ages is very impressively illustrated by the biest depicted in Rev. 13.2: “And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.“. In the book Daniel 7 and the historical events are very nicely explained that the lion is Babylon, the panther is Greece, and the bear’s feet are Medo-Persia. Likewise the sequence of the statue (dream interpretation of the statue in Daniel 2 ) from the head down, which explains the two iron legs of the Roman Empire based on the historical developments in addition to Babylon, Medo-Persia and Greece, as well as the (current) constellation Feet made of iron and clay.
Matching the statement “the dragon gave him his power” is an “ornament” on the coat of arms of Pope Gregory XIII that can also be found in St. Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican. What does a dragon have to do with the gospel other than who is defined as a dragon in Scripture?
In short: The Catholic Church does not serve God our Creator, but rather his fallen adversaries in the form of Isis, Osiris, Horus, Seth, Pan, Baal, etc.
The wafer (“host”) at the Eucharist serves as a sun symbol, which is placed in the round bowl (also symbolized as a crescent moon open at the top). This symbolizes, among other things, the headdress of the depicted “Horus mother” Isis and her representation in a “mother-child image”.
This sun god cult spread over Baal (first “ruler” Nimrod), Pergamum,
Roman Empire to Rom. Catholic Church, whose head took over the title “Pontifex Maximus” (from Babylon, Pergamon, then Roman Empire, meaning: “supreme bridge builder”) in a smooth transition in the 4th century.
Also the description of the “mother of all harlots” in Revelation 17 speak a clear language. “And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:”
This “mother of harlots” holds a golden cup in her hand. On the colored woodcut by Lucas Cranach the Elder, the “Whore Babylon”, dressed in purple, also wears the triple tiara. The papal crown, which symbolizes dominion in heaven, on earth and in the underworld. Revelation clearly describes that it is a mother. She has daughters, who are described here as whores. DAccording to Rev. 17:18 the “great city” which exercises dominion over the kings of the earth. The statement of the former prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (“Modern” Inquisition) Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger is particularly interesting. In the context of ecumenism and the “repatriation” of the Protestant churches of his time, he stated that “the universal, one, holy, catholic and apostolic church is not sister but mother of all particular churches”. (*6
You have to muster up this chutzpah first when the Vatican minted a coin (100 lire, “Fides”) in 1955, with a woman and a cup in her hand and of course the sun as a theme in the cup. Everything is openly brought to light and therefore also obvious. Anyone could have (serious) concerns about the clashes with doctrine as well as correspondences with descriptions in the gospel.
Now my assessment of the time according to the descriptions and predictions in the Revelation of the New Testament. The current events since the beginning of 2021 seem to make the predicted developments clear. The developments that have long been observed, especially in the USA, point to the predictions according to Revelation 13. The image of the first beast is erected by the second beast. The second beast comes out of the earth, has horns like a lamb but roars like a dragon. The lamb describes the Christian faith according to the gospel (early Protestantism), the dragon the adversary, which also gives the first beast its own power.
Leaving aside the architecture of the US Capitol, which is a twin of St. Peter’s, the “political-Christian” ambitions of the US administration were particularly evident in the last election campaign. One must not lose sight of the fact that the USA and its constitution were founded in the Protestant spirit.
Washington DC is located within the state of Maryland (“Mary’s Land”), whose co-founder was a Jesuit named Andrew White who moved from England
(https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_White). His former estate was called the “House of White”, or just “Whitehouse”. New US President Joe Biden is the second Catholic President in US history. The first Catholic US President was John F. Kennedy. However, he advocated a strict separation between church and state. In the meantime, “The Supreme Court” of the USA is occupied by a majority (6 out of 9) of Catholics and the Director of the Supreme Court, who was still appointed by US President Trump, is an arch-conservative Catholic. The previous and current Speaker of the Whitehouse are Catholics. About 9 years ago, the first Jesuit entered the US Senate. There are now 14 Senate members who have at least one Jesuit education behind them. (Source: https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2021/01/05/senate-catholic-jesuit-educated-239652 ).
And one is astonished: After decades of diplomatic “lack of contact” between Washington and the Vatican, US President Ronald Reagan tangled with Rome again for the first time in 1984. It then went very quickly. In 2011, the cities of Washington DC and Rome formed a partnership (https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/srgia/166853.htm) and thus the first and only city twinning of Rome. The US administration has sometimes explained this step as a “useful tool for furthering foreign policy goals“. Then-Washington Mayor Gray stated that this partnership with Rome “marked the formal beginning of sustained cultural, educational, environmental and economic exchanges between two world-class capitals“. The Rome-Washington constellation results in a “historical power couple“. For the occasion, the ancient Roman sculpture Capitoline Venus was loaned to Washington. This sculpture last left Rome when Napoleon stole it after conquering Rome in 1797.
Here one should consider that Napoleon the then Pope Pius VI. (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pius_VI. a>) removed from office, deposed him and thus ended the secular power of the Catholic Church. With the founding of the Vatican in 1929 (Lateran Treaties with Mussolini, https://de .wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateran Treaties), the Vatican spoke of the “beginning of a healing wound”. With the election of Biden (Catholic), headlines about the “healing of the USA” were also seen in the German media. Last but not least, the Vatican itself “USA: Time to heal the wounds” (https://www.vaticannews.va/de/welt/news/2021-01/usa-biden-joe-praesident-vatikan-amerika-politik-gesellschaft.html)
What does the Bible say about the first beast (out of the water)? Revelation 13:3: “And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.“.
What does the Bible say about the second beast (from the earth)? Revelation 13:12: “And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.“
There is actually no way around it: The first beast is the papacy and the second beast is the USA. The states have the appropriate world power to enforce the dogmas of the Catholic Church globally. This in the political, economic and military sense. The Catholic Church will draw the second leg to Washington and thus reestablish the world state structure according to the Middle Ages, but with a modern label. The wound is finally healed. The USA set up the image (dogmas, social teaching, gods, etc.) of the Catholic Church and also have the power to enforce this. Along with the ongoing unifications of the other religions, the focus on Jerusalem and Temple matters, the “abomination of desolation” will be set up.
A Vatican vision declared on January 6, 2021 reads: “If 2012 had been the year when Catholics ruled the highest levels of public life in the United States, 2021 could be the year when the highest levels of public life finally made way for the fullness of a Catholic vision.” (Source: https://religionnews.com/2021/01/06/could-catholic-moral-theology-light-the-way -for-a-new-gop/ )
A clear message from January 7, 2021 is the jubilation on the part of Catholicism: “For the first time in American history, no branch of our federal government will be led by a Protestant. The President will be Catholic.” and “The Protestantism was once the main ballast of America’s public life – helping us steady ourselves amidst the choppy waters that accompany life in a democratic republic. That ballast is gone and the long-term impact on American life is being felt everywhere.” (Source: https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2021/01/07/a-catholic-moment/ )
The announcement of January 6, 2021 is also unequivocal: “Biden has already stated his intention to take measures on a global level that would be compatible with Catholic social teaching.” This statement is wrapped in the benevolent-sounding framework of “avoiding a world war”.
(Source: https://www.ncronline.org/news/justice/how-biden-can-lead-us-away-world-war-fought-piecemeal )
Conclusion: The second beast will exercise the authority of the first beast. Revealed prophecy is happening here and now before our very eyes!
In view of the fact that without exception all prophecies made in the Bible actually came true and some announcements are still open, I am convinced that these will also come true as described. Here are a few more details to consider.
Much fuss is made about the mark of the beast, which is also prominently indicated in Revelation, its name and the number (number of a man, “666”). The spirits argue about this number (of a person). What is certain is that the papacy declared itself very early on as “Vicarius Filii Dei” (“Representative of the Son of God”) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarius_Filii_Dei). This designation appeared for the first time in the document on the donation of Constantine, which has long been recognized as a forgery. Mathematicians come up with the number “666” with this term (more information). The mark is partly explained with a chip implant, recently also with “intelligent crystals” in the Covid vaccinations. However, I have a different opinion. Why should the book of Revelation, which is just too full of symbolic language, now speak of tangible things for the mark? For this the Paul Galatian 6:17: “From henceforth let no man trouble me: for I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus.“. At this point, who would think that Paul was using marks to describe any external characteristics? Rather, it expresses the fact that Paul is in Jesus and Jesus is in him through his deep faith. Also the call in Revelation 7:3: “Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads.“ will hardly describe a “sticker” between the eyes.
In my opinion, the mark on the forehead is about faith and the mark on the hand is about the completed deeds (acts). The image of the beast is idolatry according to the dogmas of the Catholic Church (1st beast), implemented by the world power Washington (2nd beast). Those who believe in their teachings take the mark of the beast on the forehead, whoever participates in the rituals without faith accepts the mark on the hand. The pressure on people will be immense, as already indicated in Revelation, of the possibility of “buying and selling” only for those who bear the mark of the beast. In practice, this is the exclusion from the economic ability to act. The test run of the digital euro that has already begun and the social restructuring in the direction of “social justice” in connection with “basic income” would represent good prerequisites for the controlled dependence of people. The tribulation, which will be the “worst” that has ever existed on earth (and will never again exist), is likely to make the majority of people accept the mark of the beast. In practice, this is the exclusion from the economic ability to act. The test run of the digital euro that has already begun and the social restructuring in the direction of “social justice” in connection with “basic income” would represent good prerequisites for the controlled dependence of people. The tribulation, which will be the “worst” that has ever existed on earth (and will never exist again), is likely to make the majority of people accept the mark of the beast.
Here we are at the point of believers who may have left institutional churches. I see the Protestants, who believe themselves to be relatively safe, particularly at risk of “inadvertently” accepting the mark on their forehead (belief), since they primarily do not follow the dogmas of the Catholic Church. The merger with the “mother church” that has meanwhile been completed and the acceptance or submission is apparently not communicated very openly in the communities. The consequence of the practical reunification within the framework of ecumenism should therefore not be known to many. For Protestants as well as Catholics, however, the fact applies that the teachings represented must harmonize with the content of the Gospel and this can only be achieved through active testing, better self-study. Here, too, grace and justification lie exclusively in Jesus’ hands for each individual.
Separation from God is the goal, aimed at by the “great adversary”, who ultimately wants to take the throne and also wants to be worshiped. Wherein lies the ultimate satisfaction? Under the compulsion of the people, or in their (justifiably assumed) voluntariness? Hence the great deception, which could well be uncovered with the help of obvious information (the Bible!) if people would only make an effort. But instead, announced, mostly well-sounding messages are usually accepted unchecked.
In my opinion, people are also being misled in relation to the desired fusion with the Jewish faith and this according to the principle of “fulfilling a self-made prophecy”.
I have to digress a bit for that. Already in the area of 1590 created the Spanish Jesuit Franciso Ribera (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Ribera) the thesis of a future Antichrist, which in the according to Daniel 9 described 70th year week become active. To do this, he simply cut off the last week of the year and put it in the future. This week the Antichrist will appear (the Bible says he will be revealed. However, this is to be understood as “given for knowledge” rather than upon his “appearance”). He shall make a covenant with many, and let the grain and burnt offerings cease halfway through the week. The Redeemer will then appear, put an end to the Antichrist and set up the 1000-year kingdom on earth. The 70th week of the year in Daniel 9 clearly describes the actions of Jesus Christ, who is “cut off” after the 69th week of the year and in the middle (3.5 years) of the 70th week of the year through his death on the cross the offerings (food and burnt offering) finished. Jesus Himself was the final and unique sacrificial Lamb. Ribera’s motive was clear. Even the first Protestants recognized the Antichrist in the papacy, whose spirit was already described by Paul in his time around 2,000 years ago as already present.
It is interesting and also important in this regard that the Greek word “anti” was only used to a minority in the sense of “opposite” and mostly in the sense of “instead of”. (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti). It is well known who wants to be here on earth “in place of” Christ. It couldn’t be explained more impressively than the statements of so many “infallible” popes themselves. Pope Leo XIII. declared in his encyclical “Praeclara Gratulationis Puplicae” of June 20, 1894 “We hold the place of Almighty God on this earth”(https://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13praec.htm). Pope Innocent III. stated around 1200: “The Pope takes the place of the true God in this world” (*8. The political or worldly power took the papacy in the year 538 and “residents” since then in the same self-understanding.
Of course, it was necessary to divert attention from the knowledge of “Papadom and Antichrist”. The future thesis created by Francisco Ribera fits very well with the ideas of Judaism. Their messiah has not yet appeared, will still come, to bring peace on earth, build the 3rd temple, let the Jews live according to the Torah again and will also convince all other nations of the teaching. Here, I believe, is the common denominator that will mislead Christian and Jewish believers hand in hand. Exactly this thesis conveys e.g. in the USA Jonathan Chan (Messianic Jew), who in his speeches very often mentions “the coming Messiah, the (anointed) Jesus, the Jehushua” in one breath (sein Youtube-Kanal: https://www.youtube.com/user/bethisraelwayne.
With the declared “common” Messiah, it is at best a matter of God’s privileged person, but by no means the Son of God, let alone his sacrificial death for the acceptance of our sins and thus the opening of a path of salvation through justification through His grace.
An impressive report by “Deutschlandfunk” in 2016 shows how “in the background” is actually arranged. It describes the role Jesus played in the Talmud before it was subjected to early censorship. The details are so intense that I don’t even want to repeat them here (Quelle: https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/erste-talmud-uebersetzung-als-sich-juden-und-christen-fremd.886.de.html?dram:article_id=360208).
Jesus’ unmistakable pronouncement in Isaiah 53 counts as a “red rag” in the synagogues.
Ribera’s “self-made prophecies” for the future are mere interpretations to get the papacy out of the “line of fire” and are therefore simply “handmade” prophecies. This so-called prophecy, coupled with the ideas of the jud. faith, will now also be fulfilled by hand. The preparations have long been underway.
Donald Trump’s likeness adorns an Israeli commemorative coin together with Cyrus. Cyrus the 2nd Temple Pioneer and Trump as the 3rd Temple Pioneer. Such a “fulfilment of prophecy” is an enormous “credit to its credibility.” Not to be overlooked is the lion (symbol of Babylon) with a scimitar (“scimitar” from the Orient, a.o. symbol of Islam, https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scimitar_(Waffe)). The “pre-rapture” connected with Ribera’s theses before the tribulation or the appearance of the Anti-Christ could be particularly fatal. This thesis (propagated among other things by the Hollywood film “Left Behind”, with Nicolas Cage) (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_Behind_(2014)) applies only to the Christian community. In this sequence there is still a second chance after the following (earthly) 1000-year Reich. For Jews the opportunity to obey the Torah and for Christians also an opportunity for “reflection”. But this second chance does not exist. However, I don’t know what the details will be exactly, since eventually Islam will also be a part of these “fulfilled visions”. Reducing Jesus as a mere prophet would also be compatible with Islam. In addition, Mary also has potential as a “binder” to Christianity, since she is a larger number in Islam as well. Regardless of the reality of many of the “Marian apparitions,” the August 17, 2000 one in Assiut, Egypt has been singled out as a “blessing for both Muslims and Christians.” (Source: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marienerscheinung#Orte_von_Marienerscheinungen). At least there are already detailed visions (https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Heikle-Vision-article375870.html) about a “musical” gathering of Christians, Jews and Muslims at the 3rd Temple in Jerusalem.
But I know for sure that whatever the outcome, it will be the wrong road to hopeless error. With the denial of Jesus Christ as the only way, and believing in the presented “fulfilment of prophecy” in the necessary homage to a constructed “pseudo-God”, I believe the mark of the beast will be taken on the forehead. The simultaneous acceptance of the mark on the hand should follow automatically with eager practice of the rituals (finally forced anyway). The whole thing was established in the course of the “saving hand” during the social disaster that was now looming in the course of the “corona measures” and later also “climate measures”. It is likely that the believers who follow Scripture will soon be identified as “dissidents” and above all “endangerers to the common good”. With all the consequences.
(*1 Picture: Bild: Lawrence Jackson, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
(*2 Picture: Jean-Jacques-François Le Barbier, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
(*4 Picture: Von Odejea – Eigenes WerkFigures utilisée :Source du blasonnement, CC BY-SA 3.0
(*8 – Source: